Does a stepped approach using mixed-mode data collection reduce attrition problems in a longitudinal mental health study?
Keywords:methodology, attrition, mixed mode data collection, anxiety, depression
AbstractAccording to epidemiological standards for longitudinal studies, any appropriate attempt should be made to reach a high response rate. This also concerns re-contacting respondents in follow-up waves. In the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), respondents, who refused to visit the study site for a follow-up interview and would have been lost in a single step approach, were offered an interview at their home (in a second step) or an interview by telephone (in a third step). The stepped approach intended to increase response rates, but as a by-product, the switching of the interview response setting introduced effects due to the three different modes for obtaining data. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits and detriments of the introduction of a stepped approach using mixed-mode data collection. The attained attrition in the stepped approach was compared to the attrition rate that would have been achieved if the design had remained in a single mode. Logistic regression models were used to study if the attrition was related to patient characteristics, i.e. the attrition was selective. Propensity score matching was used to study if similar respondents reacted differently to different modes. The stepped approach using mixed-mode collection reduced the attrition from 22% to 13%, while the selectivity of the attrition was reduced on almost all socio-demographic variables, although the selectivity increased in variables that reflect the respondents’ mental health. Propensity score matching demonstrated no evidence of mode effects. Although the introduction of the stepped approach using mixed mode data collection did not completely solve the problem of attrition, we conclude that adding different modes was worthwhile.
Authors who published with Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Volumes 1–9 agreed to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work, simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Following first publication in this Journal, Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal, provided always that no charge is made for its use.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.